ABSTRACT
Background: Ghee and honey has been advocated and used as dressing for infected wounds by Sushruta (600BC). The gratifying results observed with the dressing have prompted this study which aims to establish its efficacy in chronic infected wounds over one year period A standardised ghee and honey dressing was used to treat: chronic post- operative wounds and infected per op wounds, Honey and ghee dressing markedly reduces the foul odour and discharge, significantly improving the quality of life. The study will tell us comparative result of honey and ghee dressing as compared to expensive vacuum dressing and the regular dressing materials. Innumerable Randomised Control Trials (RCTs) reported on honey dressing for infected wounds, there is substantial evidence that ghee and honey dressing has at least comparable results to other modes of treatment. The easy availability and low cost of this treatment makes it significant in developing countries. Specially in rural population, Required permission has been from the HOD of orthopaedics. Material and Methods: Total 20 patients with compound fracture and chronic infected wound, were studied during the period of March 2023 to June 2023 at BVP RMC Loni, Maharashtra. Honey and ghee were taken from a fresh sealed box in 50:50 portion according to size of wound and mixed well then it was applied on the wound directly and covered with gauge and, the dressing was changed is cleaned with sterile normal saline as compared to normal dressing materials ie betadin, povidon iodine ointment, spirit. All Patients data was collected and compiled in Microsoft excel and were statistically analysed using appropriate statistical test using SPSS software. Results: Majority patient were males. Mean duration of wound healing among honey and ghee dressing was 15.3 and of regular dressing was 8.9 days. Conclusion: Honey is one alternative solution that can be used for non-pharmacological therapy. Honey can be used as a topical dressing .........

ABSTRACT
Background: The endeavor of this study was done to compare the effectiveness of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) in subjects with chronic non-specific low back pain (LBP) as compared to intermittent lumbar traction (ILT) with simultaneous application of extensor endurance exercise with both the interventions. Methods: Quasi-experimental approach was chosen for conducting the study with pre-intervention and post-intervention evaluation of the outcomes. Convenient sampling and random allocation to groups were used to select and assign the sample that comprised of 10 subjects each in the two experimental groups and 10 subjects in control group out of total sample size of 30. Standardized tools such as VAS for evaluating the pain, modified Oswestry LBP disability questionnaire for evaluating disability were utilized. Extensor endurance exercise with warm-up and cool down were administered to both the experimental groups in common and TENS and ILT were administered to subjects of first and second experimental group respectively. Control group subjects were only treated with hot packs. Results: The data were analyzed with help of Microsoft excel. Paired t-test was done for Intragroup analysis and un-paired t-test, ANOVA for intergroup analysis. The findings suggested that there was significant difference within group-A and group-B for pain and disability and for group-C; the significant difference was found only for pain. Conclusion: From this study we concluded that, with common intervention of extensor endurance exercise for both experimental groups; significant reductions were seen in disability of subjects with chronic non-specific low back pain after four weeks of intervention with intermittent lumbar traction than that of TENS but the reduction of pain was more significant in subjects intervened with TENS than that with intermittent lumbar traction.